Monday, 11 May 2009
Tuesday, 21 April 2009
Finished Production
Feedback from the class:
Positives
- Running water v.effective at the start
- Music builds up well, mystery and intriguing
- You can clearly see where title came from - reflections used
- Having no dialogue worked well with the psychological thriller
- Camera work is good and steady where required
- Music is good
- Good variety of shots/ music matches action well e.g. looking in mirror
- Excellent titles. Effective without drawing focus away from narrative
- Jonny's costume, in particular wearing white at the end connotes purity/ innocence.
- Great camera angles
- Great juxtaposition of shots.
Negatives/Improvements
- Jonny's costume could connote his characters role more
- Confusing narrative - going to the fridge
Feedback from the teacher:
Positives
- Demonstrates excellence across all technical aspects
- Dual narrative structure is very effective with controlled choice of shots.
- Match on action is particularly effective with well exectued soundtrack that adds polish to the piece.
Negatives/Improvements
- Costume could have been better considered - not entirly convincing for this style of thriller
-Some shots could of been re-shot/held for longer
Predicted grade at current stage: A
Friday, 27 February 2009
Progress Assesment
Thursday, 26 February 2009
Rough Cut
The views back from our teacher were not to how I expected. He said it was good footage with effective shots which came to a suprise to me as i didnt think it was very good. Although a couple of our shots didnt work well before we went back previously and changed them, and he thought that they were much better this time.
The way in which we arranged our titles to the sequence made our media footage look scatty and unorganised. We arranged them to be at the start of the opening and at the end of it too. Our teacher commented on how this should be changed and where it may look better. So we changed our thoughts and timing and then decided to introduce titles over footage where the audience wont really need to focus on, we thought this would be effective because if we situate the titles where their isnt any main eye catching footage the audience wont miss any suspense produced.
Monday, 23 February 2009
Evaluation Notes
1. In what ways does your media product use, develop or challenge forms and conventions of real media products?
If you compare our media product to another media product you can see that there are similar ideas used. As a group we've tried to design a product in which focuses on real life issues in which men are represented to be the more dominant type to either 'rape' or 'kill' the other sex in this made up circumstance. The media on a whole has demonstrated these issues into peoples minds, and whenever you hear about real life cases about rape on the news the majority of the time men are shown to have been the culprits. Women on a whole are always demonstrated to be the 'weaker' victim who are always abused and drawn into this subject. In our media product we focus on a man who seems not to care what happens to a young girl and who casually after murdering her gets on with life like nothing has ever happened. This is portrayed in media products all the time as we all know to make something look not obvious you stay calm and act like everythings normal.
2. How does your media product represent particular social groups?
Our media product represents youths becoming particularly jealous over someone or something, leading onto violation and being out of control of the situation. It's often seen as when someone has an 'obsession' for someone they would go to lengths to try and make them be obsessed or involved aswell. In other media products you see more older/experienced people taking over womens lives and being violent towards them, and by younger people seeing these actions on TV programmes and on the news so they follow others footsteps. Our media shows how it can be done by younger generations too.
3. What kind of media institution might distribute your media product and why?
4. Who would be the audience for your media product?
The target audience for our media product would be 15 + just so that all ages of people can recognise the consequences you will face when taking actions like this. I think this is an effective audience to aim our media product at as we havent got state of the art studios and expensive equipment and enough experience to make a top of the range media product, but people our age will engage into what we have designed which is important for us as we want it to be successful in some ways.
5. How did you attract/address your audience?
I attracted my audience by clearly finding out what are the best themes to include in a horror based film. By watching other films also gave me ideas to include in our planning which influenced visulisations in which i thought i could change and mix around to create an effective idea in the filming piece.
6. What have you learnt about technologies from the process of constructing this product?
7. Looking back at your preliminary task, what do you feel you have learnt in the progression from it to the full product?
From the preliminary task I have learnt as an individual that progression is a key skill you need to develop whilst performing tasks. From the very start with the shots on paper I have understood that we may of needed to make additoinal changes, therefore thinking about what will be best for the final product was essential from my own ideas and group ideas. Whilst editing we have done a series of changes where if it looks good anyway, what will make it look that little bit better. By going that extra step further into developing ideas weve made good editing and effective footage.
Thursday, 12 February 2009
SHOOT 2 - Saturday 24th January
SHOOT 1 - Wednesday 21st January
Feedback from the teacher was that;
1. The slow zooming effect we used at the beginning, needed to be improved in terms of speed flowness. To make this better for next time we decdided to use a different camera to enable better quality. At the start we inclined to use a still pciture of the door and zoom in on the image, as we thought many films use this effect and usually is very effective, however this wasnt the case for us so we then decided not to use this effect.
2. The group's directing of the actor wasn't quite effective, as the shot that needs a little work on would be when our character is ferociously trying to scrub blood aways and off of his hands. He didnt look scared enough and frightened that he had just murdered somone. Therefore this was picked up on.
3. The positioning of camera during close up of the villains hands wasnt quite right for the response we wanted. We needed to make it clearer and more realistic.
4. The tilt wasn't effective it was needed to hold for longer for the audience to get that sort of anxious feeling that we had hoped for. Instead tension was built then cut off to quickly for the audience to engage with the directors interpretation.